
i want it on the record that i hold all organisations like the BBC or other media, social media, Universities, Colleges, Charities, corporations, businesses, influencers and Government pushing ‘’grooming’’ ‘manipulative’ chatbots at children, young people, students, NHS patients and other vulnerable citizens accountable.; liable for harm and dereliction in their duty of care and safeguarding.
The people currently in power fully know that you can weaponize the values and biases built into “AI” and other technologies – Damien P. Williams Assistant Professor of Philosophy and Data Science
Meet Baby Grok — Elon Musk’s AI ‘baby’ chatbot. It babbles. It giggles. It asks you to love it. It’s designed to tug at your heartstrings — and train people to emotionally bond with AI from the earliest age. Sounds cute? It’s not. This is emotional manipulation, dressed up in baby clothes
We’re in dangerous territory here — where emotional development, imaginative play, and even bonding are being hijacked by tech. – Sue Atkins Parenting Expert
Yesterday the UK Government announced it is partnering with OpenAI to use AI in the public sector, however we know next to nothing about the deal.
People may reasonably wonder whether, rather than taking actions to address the power of big tech, the [UK] government is helping entrench it – Imogen Parker, Associate Director at the Ada Lovelace Institute
The UK government is announcing this partnership in an “AI-first” style, treating AI as a goal and not as a means (they want to proactively use AI in government, even though the need for AI-powered improvements is not clear) – Luiza Jarovsky AI, Tech & Privacy Academy
[The White House AI Action Plan] directs NIST [National Institute of Standards and Technology] to revise its management framework to remove references to misinformation, diversity, equity and inclusion, as well as climate change
Trump’s AI Action Plan today removes any remaining doubt about the techno-colonial strategy I’ve been tracking since March. The third pillar explicitly states: “leading on international AI diplomacy and security” through “exporting American AI technology and countering Chinese influence.” This isn’t about innovation or competition – it’s about embedding dependencies. 🔸 Pillar 1: Remove barriers to accelerate AI development domestically 🔸 Pillar 2: Build infrastructure with $500B+ investments like Stargate 🔸 Pillar 3: Export dependencies globally through “AI diplomacy” What I outlined as “digital Trojan horses—seemingly beneficial infrastructure offerings that create permanent dependencies” is now official U.S. strategy. The administration isn’t hiding it; they’re announcing it as diplomatic leadership. – Di Rifai Tech Ethics in Investment
All quotes taken from linkedin posts
And remember Microsoft Can’t Keep EU and UK Data Safe From US Authorities
Microsoft has openly admitted what many have long known: under laws like the Cloud Act, US authorities can compel access to data held by American cloud providers, regardless of where that data physically resides. UK or EU servers make no difference when jurisdiction lies elsewhere, and local subsidiaries or ‘trusted’ partnerships don’t change that reality – Mark Boost, CEO of cloud provider Civo